Book Review: Matter – Iain M. Banks

Matter - Iain M Banks

Matter - Iain M Banks

I’ve finally finished “Matter”, the latest “Culture” novel by Iain M. Banks.
It’s been three years since his last book, “The Algebraist”, about which I had
very mixed feelings. Like many of Banks’ readers, I was hoping for a return to a
more confident kind of story-telling, without the inconsistencies that had
marred “The Algebraist”.

Overall, I enjoyed it a great deal.
Structurally, it has a familiar pattern: three journeys, party in space but
mostly of self-discovery, that lead up to a singular point of crisis. Sounds a
bit like “Lord of the Rings”, doesn’t it? Unlike “LotR”, the protagonists are
three siblings, but as in Tolkien’s work the journeys are the main point of the
tale. The revelation of the true nature of the crisis, and the climactic
confrontation, are compressed into the last few pages. The dénouement is crudely
perfunctory; a brief epilogue that follows an appendix, and almost seems to
parody the close of Tolkien’s “Return of the King”.

Although the
narrative is populated with familiar elements from earlier “Culture” novels,
“Matter” keeps scratching some of the itches that affected Banks in “The
Algebraist”. There is a cynical undercurrent about the illusion of “progress”,
together with a determined attempt to destroy any comfortable identification
that we might make between ourselves and any particular part of his menagerie.
Perhaps you remember the wonderful quote by Sir Martin Rees, the British
astronomer:
“It will not be humans who witness the demise of the Sun six
billion years hence; it will be entities as different from us as we are from
bacteria.”

Banks confronts us with a universe whose population spans a
vast spectrum of capabilities, of intentions, of possibilities. And with that
variety there is inevitably going to be confusion, frustration and mutual
incomprehension. As in “The Algebraist”, there are dead ends and unexplained
elements. This is an important aspect of Banks’ world that needs to be conveyed,
but some of the protagonists’ confusion winds up spilling over to the reader.

“Matter” feels more explicitly violent than earlier books by Banks; it’s
as if he’s been reading Scalzi and other mil-sci-fi writers. This is not a
criticism, just an observation. There is a deliberate “compare and contrast”
between traditional warfare – think 17th century Europe with a dash of
steam-punk – and conflict in a future of robotic weaponry and smart, morphing
armour:

“In the unlikely event we do get involved in a serious firefight
and the suits think you’re under real threat,” Djan Seriy had told the two Sarl
men, “they’ll take over. High-end exchanges happen too fast for human reactions
so the suits will do the aiming, firing and dodging for you.” She’d seen the
expressions of dismay on their faces, and shrugged. “It’s like all war; months
of utter boredom punctuated by moments of sheer terror. It’s just the moments
are sometimes measured in milliseconds and the engagement’s often over before
you’re aware it has even begun.”
(“Matter”, p.474)

So if “The
Algebraist” was a three-and-a-half star book, “Matter” is a solid four-star
effort, and as I think about it over the next few days I may add another half
star. Definitely recommended; I hope we don’t have to wait another three years
for the next one.

Advertisements

About peterschow

"the Schow must go on"
This entry was posted in book review. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s